Chimera
The landscape has a vital role for the development of local identity and the role of Internalization social. This role socially is an immediate consequence of the experience and observation of the territory. The communicative dimension of landscape is full and as we see, many times, and it is used to model and as tourism or commercial values.
We see how there is now an opportune compulsive use of landscape images and we believe reflect on some of the consequences that implies: On one side it extends to trivialize the complex relationship between reality and its representation. On the other hand, we see that there is a tendency substituted for contact with the real world by a stereotypical representation and induced the same. Even we can say that the experiment is conditioned places are predetermined and emotional ties are established with the site or its representation. There are no surprises already, or involvement, there is no meeting point between vision and emotion.
With this in mind, we wanted to develop a project in which experimentation and interaction with the landscape was essential, both at the time of the shooting, as the editing and production. Thus it argued that there is a clean look against the trend of representation of idealized landscapes with tourist intentions.
We suggest experiences related to a physical location, in this case a place "invented", a product of the meeting between the looks on each author offers tourist places in itself. The places to which they apply, in general, of beauty and advance clichés mentioned.
To get away from the most commercial vision and to bring us closer to this most emotional and personal vision in the territory, we offer more ambiguous readings that want to enhance images by wanting foster an evocative atmosphere, creating images that suggest more they show.
The landscape that we try to capture has nothing to do with distances and sizes, but with the practice of walking and looking, how the elements relate to each other, with the observer and experience of the place. In our images is not important photographic referent, but the expression of a relationship. It is not intended to show only a place but the presence and emotion of a subject in this place, a reality that comes from a "mental territory," the less tangible essence of things.
It is important that the staff of each style differs authors as well the personal narrative is respected. But it is also important, he perceives the pair of images as one, the landscape in which we will access a joint and ambiguous form, sometimes surreal. Thus greater freedom and subjectivity is permitted in the reading of the viewer and so we can move away from the most obvious and simple vision that we often require.
Chimera
The landscape has a vital role for the development of local identity and the role of internalization social. This role socially is an immediate consequence of the experience and observation of the territory. The communicative dimension of landscape is full and as we see, many times, and it is used to model and as tourism or commercial values.
We see how there is now an opportune compulsive use of landscape images and we believe reflect on some of the consequences that implies: On one side it extends to trivialize the complex relationship between reality and its representation. On the other hand, we see that there is a tendency substituted for contact with the real world by a stereotypical representation and induced the same. Even we can say that the experiment is conditioned places are predetermined and emotional ties are established with the site or its representation. There are no surprises already, or involvement, there is no meeting point between vision and emotion.
With this in mind, we wanted to develop a project in which experimentation and interaction with the landscape was essential, both at the time of the shooting, as the editing and production. Thus it argued that there is a clean look against the trend of representation of idealized landscapes with tourist intentions. We suggest experiences related to a physical location, in this case a place "invented", a product of the meeting between the looks on each author offers tourist places in itself. The places to which they apply, in general, of beauty and advance clichés mentioned.
To get away from the most commercial vision and to bring us closer to this most emotional and personal vision in the territory, we offer more ambiguous readings that want to enhance images by wanting foster an evocative atmosphere, creating images that suggest more they show.
The landscape that we try to capture has nothing to do with distances and sizes, but with the practice of walking and looking, how the elements relate to each other, with the observer and experience of the place.
In our images is not important photographic referent, but the expression of a relationship. It is not intended to show only a place but the presence and emotion of a subject in this place, a reality that comes from a "mental territory," the less tangible essence of things.
It is important that the staff of each style differs authors as well the personal narrative is respected. But it is also important, he perceives the pair of images as one, the landscape in which we will access a joint and ambiguous form, sometimes surreal.
Thus greater freedom and subjectivity is permitted in the reading of the viewer and so we can move away from the most obvious and simple vision that we often require.